| TDoc Number | Title | Source | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| S4-260126 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis on complexity evaluation of ULBC with WMOPS | Bytedance | |
| S4-260128 | [FS_ULBC] Influence of code optimization on WMOPS | Bytedance | |
| S4-260132 | [FS_ULBC] Discussion of FS_ULBC Objective Speech Quality Assessment Method | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260136 | Updates to the simulation results for FS_ULBC | Xiaomi Technology | |
| S4-260137 | [FS_ULBC] On eCall scenario for ULBC | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | |
| S4-260141 | [FS_ULBC] On target platforms for ULBC | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | |
| S4-260142 | [FS_ULBC] On complexity and memory constraints for ULBC | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | |
| S4-260144 | [FS_ULBC]TR 26.940 V 0.5.1 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260146 | [FS_ULBC] Permanent Document v0.5.0 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260148 | [FS_ULBC] WorkPlan of FS_ULBC v0.5 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260149 | [FS_ULBC] On Assumptions and Open Issues for NB-IoT GEO Simulation | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260150 | [FS_ULBC] Updates of the permanent document based on 3GPP TR 23.700-19 | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260151 | [FS_ULBC]Considerations for ULBC Codec Selection Process | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260152 | [FS_ULBC] Analyzing semantic intelligibility in lossy coded audio signals | vivo Mobile Communication Co., Nokia, Xiaomi Technology, Samsung, Spreadtrum, Bytedance | |
| S4-260154 | [FS_ULBC]pCR on Existing codec technologies | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260155 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis of AI Codec Real-Time Performance (RTF) and Complexity Scaling | vivo Mobile Communication Co., Xiaomi Technology, Spreadtrum, Bytedance | |
| S4-260157 | [FS_ULBC] Discussion on Audio Bandwidth for ULBC | vivo, Samsung, MediaTek Inc., Bytedance, Nokia, Xiaomi, Spreadtrum | |
| S4-260158 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis of AI Codec Complexity Scaling | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260159 | [FS_ULBC] On codec bitrate and capacity discussion for ULBC | vivo, Samsung, Spreadtrum, MediaTek Inc. | |
| S4-260165 | On ULBC complexity and RTF analysis | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Novamint, Nokia | |
| S4-260173 | [FS_ULBC] Discussion on Methodology for Delay & Error Trace Generation | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260175 | [FS_ULBC] Proposed ULBC design constraints living document | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260209 | [FS_ULBC] Alignment Analysis on Complexity of DAC model | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260214 | [FS_ULBC] Feasible bitrates for the NTN-TDL-C channel model with 10-degree elevation angle | Qualcomm Incorporated, Xiaomi | |
| S4-260215 | [FS_ULBC] On the scheduling timing uncertainty | Qualcomm Incorporated, Ericsson LM | |
| S4-260216 | [FS_ULBC] On transmission delay for voice over NB-IoT NTN | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260217 | [FS_ULBC] Support for Dual-Tone Multi-Frequency for IMS voice over NB-IoT NTN | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260220 | Proposed design constraints for noise suppression, DTX, and non-speech inputs | Nokia | |
| S4-260223 | UE Antenna Gain in link-budget evaluations | Ericsson LM | |
| S4-260233 | On reference code and model format | Fraunhofer IIS, Apple Inc. | |
| S4-260235 | On the use of objective metrics in ULBC standardization | Orange | |
| S4-260241 | On complexity estimation of ULBC | Fraunhofer IIS | |
| S4-260255 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Re-Focus Proposal | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Nokia, Novamint | |
| S4-260256 | [FS_ULBC] Feasible TBS values and packet loss traces for 80ms bundling period for ULBC over NB-IoT NTN GEO channel | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260271 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Performance Requirements | Apple Inc. | |
| S4-260272 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Codec Testing in Background Noise | Apple Inc. | |
| S4-260275 | [FS_ULBC] On device capability diversity | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Nokia, Novamint | |
| S4-260279 | On the use of objective metrics in ULBC standardization | Orange, Dolby Laboratories Inc. | |
| S4-260290 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis and recommended handling of the reply liaisons from other working groups to SA4 on ULBC | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260292 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Re-Focus Proposal | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Nokia, Novamint, Vivo | |
| S4-260299 | [FS_ULBC] Proposed ULBC design constraints living document v0.0.2 | vivo Mobile Communication Co., Orange | |
| S4-260300 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis and recommended handling of the reply liaisons from other working groups to SA4 on ULBC | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260305 | On the use of objective metrics in ULBC standardization | Orange, Dolby Laboratories Inc. | |
| S4-260310 | [FS_ULBC] On the scheduling timing uncertainty | Qualcomm Incorporated, Ericsson LM | |
| S4-260311 | [FS_ULBC] Feasible bitrates for the NTN-TDL-C channel model with 10-degree elevation angle | Qualcomm Incorporated, Xiaomi | |
| S4-260313 | [FS_ULBC] Feasible TBS values and packet loss traces for 80ms bundling period for ULBC over NB-IoT NTN GEO channel | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260316 | [FS_ULBC] On transmission delay for voice over NB-IoT NTN | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260325 | Reply LS on issues related to support of IMS voice over NB-IoT NTN connected to EPC | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260326 | Reply LS on on the RAN simulation assumptions, bundling period and SPS for ULBC | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260354 | [FS_ULBC] On target platforms for ULBC | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | |
| S4-260364 | [FS_ULBC] On vehicle emergency call scenario for ULBC | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | |
| S4-260370 | [FS_ULBC] On Assumptions and Open Issues for NB-IoT GEO Simulation | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260386 | [FS_ULBC] Updates of the permanent document based on 3GPP TR 23.700-19 | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260415 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis on complexity evaluation of ULBC with WMOPS | Bytedance | |
| S4-260417 | On the use of objective metrics in ULBC standardization | Orange, Dolby Laboratories Inc. | |
| S4-260419 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Performance Requirements | Apple Inc. | |
| S4-260420 | [FS_ULBC] ULBC Codec Testing in Background Noise | Apple Inc., Lenovo | |
| S4-260424 | [FS_ULBC]TR 26.940 V 0.6.0 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260432 | On complexity estimation of ULBC | Fraunhofer IIS | |
| S4-260434 | [FS_ULBC] Permanent Document v0.6.0 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260435 | [FS_ULBC] WorkPlan of FS_ULBC v0.6 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260442 | [FS_ULBC] On codec bitrate and capacity discussion for ULBC | vivo, Samsung, Spreadtrum, MediaTek Inc. | |
| S4-260443 | [FS_ULBC] Alignment Analysis on Complexity of DAC model | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260444 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis of AI Codec Complexity Scaling | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260445 | [FS_ULBC] Analysis of AI Codec Real-Time Performance (RTF) and Complexity Scaling | vivo Mobile Communication Co., Xiaomi Technology, Spreadtrum, Bytedance | |
| S4-260446 | On ULBC complexity and RTF analysis | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Novamint, Nokia | |
| S4-260447 | [FS_ULBC] On device capability diversity | Dolby Laboratories Inc., Nokia, Novamint | |
| S4-260459 | [FS_ULBC] On device capability diversity | vivo Mobile Communication Co., | |
| S4-260462 | Reply LS on on the RAN simulation assumptions, bundling period and SPS for ULBC | Qualcomm Incorporated | |
| S4-260474 | [FS_ULBC]TR 26.940 V 0.6.1 | China Mobile Com. Corporation | |
| S4-260475 | [FS_ULBC] WorkPlan of FS_ULBC v0.6 | China Mobile Com. Corporation |
71 / 71 TDocs shown | PDFs: 70 | AI Summaries: 38 | AI Proposals: 38