Extracted Proposals

Proposal

It is proposed to agree to the updates to the TOR as proposed in the following and send this for approval to SA plenary in March 2026.

Extracted Proposals

Proposal 1: SA2 has no restriction to analyze AI traffic characteristics and study the system impacts (e.g., QoS, Session Management, traffic detection) on how to support AI traffic.

Proposal 2: For AI traffic characteristics study, SA2 may refer to the outcome of SA1 and SA4 if necessary.

Proposal: SA plenary acknowledges SA4 responsibility in identifying data types and traffic characteristics for AI/ML and that work in other groups should take SA4 work into account.

Proposal

It is proposed to take this information into account.

Proposal 1: The network emulator based on Linux tc with netem qdisc provides an appropriate baseline for media delivery protocol evaluation under realistic 3GPP network conditions.

Proposal 2: The 5QI-derived network profiles may be used as reference conditions for comparing media delivery technologies across the related study items.

Proposal 3: Additional network profiles (such as satellite, congested, and edge scenarios) complement the 5QI profiles for comprehensive evaluation coverage.

Proposal 4: Document the emulator architecture and profiles in TR 26.934 (Test platform for media delivery technologies) to ensure consistent evaluation methodology.

Extracted Proposals

Based on my review of the document, there are no explicit proposals in the standard 3GPP proposal format (e.g., "Proposal X:", "Proposal:", etc.).

The document contains a section titled "5. Proposal" at the end, but it does not contain a formally formatted proposal. Instead, it states:

"We propose to take these suggestion into account in case a revision to the SA4 Terms of Reference is made, we provide our suggested updates to the SA4 terms of reference attached to this paper."

This is a general statement about providing suggested updates in an attachment, rather than a formal numbered or formatted proposal as typically found in 3GPP documents.

Proposal: It is proposed to evaluate if an equivalent tool could be developed within 3GPP to:

• Have an online version of TR 21.905 as the entry point
• Continue to develop TR 21.905 via online mechanism
• Define a mechanism to provide a request for adding a new acronym or new terms, per WGs to the online version of TR 21.905.
• Allow to search for acronyms and terms and provide pointers across specifications.

Extracted Proposals

Proposal

The proponents request that SA Plenary: agrees to correct the SID to designate the deliverable as a standard (public) TR rather than an internal TR, to align with the study's objective of identifying potential normative work and ensuring industry-wide accessibility of the findings.

Proposals

Based on my review of the document, there are no explicit proposals in this contribution.

The document is marked as "Document for: Information" and provides an analysis of the current state of SA4 specifications (26 series) in preparation for 6G Specs Modernization. While it contains recommendations and suggestions throughout Section 3 and Section 4, none of these are explicitly formatted or labeled as "Proposal" using any of the standard proposal formats.

The document concludes with "Summary and Recommendations" rather than formal proposals, and the recommendations are presented as narrative text rather than numbered or labeled proposals.