This document does not contain any technical proposals.

The document is a brief report from SA#110 (3GPP TSG SA Plenary meeting #110) on SA4 topics, presented by the SA4 Chair. It summarizes the outcomes of various SA4 submissions including work item reports, specifications, CRs (Change Requests), and new Study Items and Work Items that were approved, noted, or endorsed at the plenary meeting. However, it does not include any explicit proposals in the formats specified (e.g., "Proposal X:", "Proposal:", etc.).

Proposal 1: RAN1 generally agrees with the overall set of parameters selected by SA4, with the following comments:

• On the modulation order, RAN1 would like to highlight that MCS indices 0 and 1 use pi/2 BPSK for single tone transmissions. It is up to SA4 to decide whether to evaluate pi/2 BPSK with MCS indices 0 and 1.

• For the downlink CNR, the relevant UE parameter is noise figure (and/or G/T) instead of transmit power. RAN1 recommends SA4 corrects the following sentence:

DL CNR=-3.3dB, 0dBi UE antenna gain, 15kHz SCS, 12 tones, 1 UE receive antenna, noise figure of 7dB.

• If SA4 wants to evaluate 40ms bundling, RAN1 specifications may support this case by assuming 15kHz SCS (single and multi-tone) in the uplink. It is up to SA4 whether to consider this case in their evaluations.

• RAN1/2 have not yet started the work on designing SPS. Therefore, RAN1 currently cannot confirm whether the example frame structure for SPS (related to Figure 5.2.2.3-2 and associated text) will be supported.

• In previous RAN1 evaluations related to voice, RAN1 has considered 2% BLER as the target performance metric. It is up to SA4 to decide what values to use in their evaluations.

• Power classes are to be confirmed by RAN4.

• Although the example Figure 5.2.2.3-1 is supportable by RAN1 specifications in most scenarios, it may not be supportable in the case where the cell is very large (e.g. >3000km), when the UE does not support TA report and the network does not support UE-specific K-offset. The example Figure 5.2.2.3-1 itself also requires the UE to be configured with two HARQ processes and with HARQ feedback disabled.

Proposal 2: RAN1 considers that the value of -31.6dB/K may be used by SA4 in their evaluations. Some companies in RAN1 consider that values higher than -31.6dB/K can be supported in commercial implementations, but RAN1 could not reach consensus on these values.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. The document is a Liaison Statement (LS) reply from RAN1 to SA2 regarding issues related to support of IMS voice over NB-IoT NTN connected to EPC. It contains an ACTION item directed to SA2, but no formal proposals.

This document does not contain any proposals. The document is a Liaison Statement (LS) from RAN WG1 to SA WG4 regarding traffic models for immersive communication, and it contains a "Working Assumption" and an "ACTION" item, but no formal proposals.

Proposal: RAN2 respectfully asks SA2 to take the reply and information above into consideration.

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from RAN WG2 to SA WG4 providing responses to questions, but no formal proposals are included in the text.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from RAN3 to SA4 containing questions (Question A, Question B, and Question C) and requesting actions, but no formal proposals are present in the text.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) response from RAN4 to SA4 regarding RAN simulation assumptions for ULBC, providing information about supported power classes for NB-IoT NTN UE.

Proposal: SA1's view is that - support for more than one (simultaneous) IMS voice call is not required in this Release. - support for Dual-Tone Multi-Frequency (DTMF) is required.

Proposal

SA 1 kindly asks SA to consolidate SA 1 reply and replies from other working groups, and respond to GSMA NG UPG.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Reply LS (Liaison Statement) from SA2 to SA4 regarding RAN simulation assumptions for ULBC, and contains only answers to questions and an action item, but no formal proposals.

There are no proposals in this document.

This document is a Liaison Statement (LS) from SA2 to other working groups (RAN2, SA4, CT1, SA3, SA1, RAN1) containing questions about IMS voice over NB-IoT NTN connected to EPC. It contains 11 questions but no formal proposals.

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from SA2 to SA4 regarding AI/ML for Media, which provides responses and requests clarification but does not include any formal proposals.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) reply from SA3 to SA2 regarding issues related to support of IMS voice over NB-IoT NTN connected to EPC. The document contains a question, an answer, and an action item, but no formal proposals.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. The document is a Liaison Statement (LS) reply from SA3 to SA2 regarding LI requirements on IMS Data Channel, and it contains feedback and actions rather than proposals.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from SA3 to SA2 providing information about the completion of security work for IMS avatar communication, but does not include any formal proposals.

This document does not contain any technical proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) reply from 3GPP TSG SA WG6 to SA regarding external data channel content access requirements. The document only contains answers to questions and action items, but no formal proposals.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) response from 3GPP TSG SA to GSMA NG UPG regarding external data channel content access requirements, containing only feedback from various SA working groups and action items.

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) informing other 3GPP groups about the completion of a study on AI/ML consistency alignment and the approval of related documents.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from SA3-LI to SA4 and SA2 regarding LI requirements on IMS Data Channel, and contains only an ACTION item, not proposals.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any explicit proposals. The document is a draft Reply LS (Liaison Statement) that provides information and context to RAN WG1 regarding traffic models for immersive communication, but it does not include any sections explicitly marked as "Proposal" in any of the standard formats.

This document does not contain any technical proposals. It is a Liaison Statement (LS) from SA3-LI to other working groups (SA2, SA3, SA4, SA6) regarding Lawful Interception (LI) requirements for 6G. The document contains requests and actions directed to other groups, but no formal proposals in the format typically found in 3GPP technical documents.

Extracted Proposals

This document does not contain any proposals. The document is a Liaison Statement (LS) response from SA4 to RAN1 providing information on traffic models for immersive communication with haptics, but it does not include any sections explicitly marked as "Proposal" in any of the standard formats.