Meeting: TSGS4_135_India | Agenda Item: 8.4
6 documents found
| TDoc Number | Source | Title | Summarie |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBC |
[5MBUSA] MBSF notification event corrections
|
Change Request Summary: 26.502 CR 0046 Rev 1Document Information
Reason for ChangeThis CR addresses two main issues:
Technical ChangesChange 1: Clause 4.6.2 - Notification Events TableModifications to Table 4.6.2-1:
Addition of two missing notification events:
Change 2: Clause 5.3 - Procedure Corrections in Figure 5.3-2Step 14 correction:
- Changed service operation from generic notification to Step 15 correction:
- Changed service operation to Step 17 correction:
- Changed service operation to Impact
|
|
| BBC |
[5MBUSA] MBSF notification event corrections
|
3GPP TR 26.502 Change Request SummaryGeneral Information
Reason for ChangeThis CR addresses two main issues:
Technical ChangesSection 4.6.2: Notification EventsModifications to Table 4.6.2-1:
Section 5.3: Procedures for User Service ProvisioningCorrections to Figure 5.3-2 Call Flow: Three specific steps in the MBS User Service internal provisioning procedure have been corrected:
Impact AssessmentConsequences if not approved: - Continued misalignment between stage-2 (SA4) and stage-3 (CT3) normative specifications - The MBSF cannot be implemented correctly as currently specified Alignment impact: - This CR aligns TS 26.502 with TS 29.580 - No impact on TS 29.580 is required |
|
| BBC |
[5MBUSA] MBSF notification event corrections
|
3GPP TR 26.502 Change Request - MBSF Notification Event CorrectionsGeneral Information
Reason for ChangeThis CR addresses two main issues:
Without approval, there would be misalignment between SA4 (stage-2) and CT3 (stage-3) normative specifications, and the MBSF could not be implemented as currently specified. Technical ChangesChange 1: Clause 4.6.2 - Notification Events TableModifications to Table 4.6.2-1:
The table now properly indicates which reference points stimulate each notification event, with brackets indicating when the event originates from another NF and is propagated through the MBSF. Change 2: Clause 5.3 - User Service Provisioning ProceduresCorrections to Figure 5.3-2 call flow steps:
Impact
|
|
| Qualcomm Korea |
[AMD_PRO-MED] Corrections to CMCD phase 1
|
Change Request Summary: Corrections to CMCD Phase 1CR Metadata
Reason for ChangeMPEG-DASH 6th edition contains an ambiguity regarding the interpretation of service location and adaptation set based filtering. After consultation with client implementers, it was identified that the interpretation in 5G Media Streaming does not align with actual implementations. The issue relates to whether the filtering restrictions apply to the requests themselves or to the reporting of CMCD data. Summary of Technical ChangesThe CR clarifies that the restrictions specified in the CMCD configuration apply to which requests include CMCD information, not to which CMCD data is reported. This is a critical distinction for proper implementation of the CMCD (Common Media Client Data) feature. Detailed Technical ModificationsClause G.5.2.2 - DASH Content Offering Requirements and RecommendationsKey Change: Modified the description of filtering capabilities to clarify scope.
This change emphasizes that the filtering controls which HTTP requests carry CMCD data, rather than controlling what data is reported once CMCD is included. Clause G.5.2.4 - Examples (Informative)Key Changes: Updated the example description and XML comments to align with the corrected interpretation.
ImpactIf Not Approved
Affected Specifications
Technical ContextThis correction is part of the CMCD Phase 1 implementation in 5G Media Streaming. CMCD allows DASH clients to convey media-specific information to the CDN/application server to enable better delivery optimization. The filtering mechanism allows content providers to control the overhead of CMCD reporting by limiting which requests carry this additional metadata. |
|
| Nokia |
Correction to quality reporting scheme information
|
Change Request Summary: Correction to Quality Reporting Scheme InformationCR Details
Background and Reason for ChangeRAN3 identified misalignment between RAN3 and SA4 specifications regarding the usage of communication service type for QoE Measurement Collection (QMC) for MBS. This was communicated through documents S4-251660/R3-255896 and S4-260016. The issue was discussed at SA4#134 (S4-252077) and further refined in the MBS SWG Telco (S4aI260011). Main Technical Contributions1. Restructuring of Quality Reporting Scheme (Clause 10.1 and 10.5)Key Changes: - Separated generic DASH quality reporting scheme from QMC-specific functionality - Clarified that when using MPD or OMA-DM, the Quality Reporting scheme in clause 10.5 applies - When using QMC functionality, the Quality Reporting scheme defined in Annex L applies - Updated clause 10.1 to reflect that QMC reporting is specified in Annex L Moved Elements from Clause 10.5 to Annex L:
- Removed from QMC Context:
- 2. Updates to Annex L.1 (Configuration and Reporting)Clarifications:
- Updated reference from clause 10.5 to Annex L.2 for QMC-specific quality reporting scheme
- Maintained explanation that 3. New Annex L.2 Structure (XML Configuration)Major Additions: New Table X: XML Schema of QMC ConfigurationComplete XML schema definition for QMC configuration including:
- Key Attributes in QMC Configuration:
- New Table Y: Semantics of QMC Reporting Scheme InformationComprehensive semantics table defining: - All QMC-specific attributes and elements - Usage indicators (Mandatory/Optional) - Detailed descriptions for each parameter Communication Service Type Values:
- 4. XML Schema UpdatesClause 10.5 Schema Changes:
- Removed Annex L.2 Schema Additions:
- Complete QMC-specific XML schema with namespace 5. Key Differences Between Generic DASH and QMC Reporting| Aspect | Generic DASH (10.5) | QMC (Annex L) |
|--------|-------------------|---------------|
| Reporting Server | Required ( Impact and AlignmentThis CR ensures proper alignment between: - SA4 specifications (TS 26.247) - RAN3 specifications - QMC functionality requirements - MBS communication service type definitions (TS 38.300) The changes maintain backward compatibility for non-QMC implementations while providing clear, separate specifications for QMC-based quality reporting. |
|
| Nokia |
[5GMSA] Correction to interface M11 in 5GMS architecture.
|
3GPP Change Request Summary: TS 26.501 CR 0034Document Information
Purpose of Change RequestThis CR addresses an architectural inconsistency in TS 26.501 regarding the M11 reference point. The M11 interface is defined as the reference point between the Media Session Handler and the Media Access Function (both components within the Media Client) for configuring the Media Session Handler and/or media access control. However, this interface is not correctly represented in several clauses of the specification. Technical CorrectionsThe CR proposes corrections across multiple architectural scenarios where the M11 interface is referenced: 1. Edge Computing Integration (Clause 4.5.2)
2. eMBMS-based Delivery (Clauses 4.6.1 and 4.6.2)
3. Data Collection and Reporting (Clause 4.7.1)
4. MBS-based Delivery (Clause 4.9.1)
Impact AssessmentConsequences if not approved: The specification would continue to contain incorrect reference point representations in the architecture, leading to potential implementation inconsistencies and misunderstandings of the Media Client internal interfaces. Other specifications affected: None identified SummaryThis is a straightforward correction CR that ensures consistent and accurate representation of the M11 reference point across multiple architectural scenarios in TS 26.501, including edge computing, eMBMS delivery, data collection/reporting, and MBS delivery contexts. |
Total Summaries: 6 | PDFs Available: 6