Review: 7.4

Proposal: Add the missing binary file format for the TD binaural renderer in Table 3G in clause 5.10.

Proposal 1: Add the missing binary file format for the TD binaural renderer in Table 3G in clause 5.10.

Proposal: Removing bandwidth for RTCP in b=AS calculation for the IVAS codec, to align with other codecs and general session setup procedures.

Proposal: Removing bandwidth for RTCP in b=AS calculation for the IVAS codec, to align with other codecs and general session setup procedures.

Based on my review of the document, there are no formal proposals explicitly marked with "Proposal" (numbered or unnumbered) in this 3GPP contribution.

The document is marked as "Document for: Information and discussion" and presents observations about non-bit-exact conformance of metadata output in IVAS. While Section 3 (Conclusion) discusses expectations and invites discussion, it does not contain any formally stated proposals using the standard proposal format.

I have carefully reviewed the provided 3GPP document (a Change Request for TS 26.119).

After thorough examination of the entire document, including all sections and the changes proposed, I found no proposals in this document.

This document is a Change Request (CR) that specifies technical changes to be made to the specification, but it does not contain any sections explicitly marked as "Proposal", "Proposal X:", "Proposal X.", etc. The document contains: - A CR form with metadata - Reason for change - Summary of change - Consequences if not approved - The actual specification text changes (marked as "CHANGE 1", "NEXT CHANGE", etc.)

But no formal proposals as typically found in contribution documents.

I have carefully reviewed the provided 3GPP document (S4-260167, a Change Request for TS 26.119).

This document does not contain any proposals.

The document is a Change Request (CR) that specifies changes to technical specifications regarding IVAS codec capability levels for different XR device types. While it contains a "Reason for change," "Summary of change," and "Consequences if not approved" sections, these are standard CR form fields and not formal proposals in the format you described.

The document shows technical specification changes (marked as "CHANGE 1", "NEXT CHANGE", etc.) but does not include any sections explicitly labeled as "Proposal", "Proposal:", "Proposal X:", etc.

There are no proposals in this document.

This is a Change Request (CR) document for 3GPP specification 26.117, which proposes technical changes to properly reference IVAS codec levels. While it contains technical specifications and requirements, it does not contain any sections explicitly marked as "Proposal", "Proposal X:", "Proposal X.", etc.

The document contains a "Reason for change", "Summary of change", and technical specification changes, but these are not formatted as proposals in the standard 3GPP proposal format.

Based on my analysis of the document, there are no proposals explicitly marked in this 3GPP document.

This is a Change Request (CR) document (S4-260238) that proposes modifications to specification 26.117, but it does not contain any sections labeled as "Proposal", "Proposal:", "Proposal X:", etc. The document contains:

• A reason for change
• A summary of change
• Technical specifications and requirements
• But no formally marked proposals in the format typically found in 3GPP contribution documents

The document appears to be a CR form that directly specifies changes to be made to the specification rather than proposing them in the typical proposal format.