Proposal 1: RAN1 generally agrees with the overall set of parameters selected by SA4, with the following comments:

- On the modulation order, RAN1 would like to highlight that MCS indices 0 and 1 use pi/2 BPSK for single tone transmissions. It is up to SA4 to decide whether to evaluate pi/2 BPSK with MCS indices 0 and 1.

- For the downlink CNR, the relevant UE parameter is noise figure (and/or G/T) instead of transmit power. RAN1 recommends SA4 corrects the following sentence:

DL CNR=-3.3dB, 0dBi UE antenna gain, 15kHz SCS, 12 tones, 1 UE receive antenna, noise figure of 7dB.

- If SA4 wants to evaluate 40ms bundling, RAN1 specifications may support this case by assuming 15kHz SCS (single and multi-tone) in the uplink. It is up to SA4 whether to consider this case in their evaluations.

- RAN1/2 have not yet started the work on designing SPS. Therefore, RAN1 currently cannot confirm whether the example frame structure for SPS (related to Figure 5.2.2.3-2 and associated text) will be supported.

- In previous RAN1 evaluations related to voice, RAN1 has considered 2% BLER as the target performance metric. It is up to SA4 to decide what values to use in their evaluations.

- Power classes are to be confirmed by RAN4.

- Although the example Figure 5.2.2.3-1 is supportable by RAN1 specifications in most scenarios, it may not be supportable in the case where the cell is very large (e.g. >3000km), when the UE does not support TA report and the network does not support UE-specific K-offset. The example Figure 5.2.2.3-1 itself also requires the UE to be configured with two HARQ processes and with HARQ feedback disabled.

Proposal 2: RAN1 considers that the value of -31.6dB/K may be used by SA4 in their evaluations. Some companies in RAN1 consider that values higher than -31.6dB/K can be supported in commercial implementations, but RAN1 could not reach consensus on these values.